MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2318753479 · doi:10.3167/ip.2001.170109

The Italian Presidency of the G8 Summit

2002· article· en· W2318753479 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Nicholas Bayne

Bibliographic record

VenueItalian Politics · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicRegional Development and Policy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSummitPresidencyPolitical sciencePoliticsPublic administrationOrder (exchange)Economic historyLawGeographyBusinessHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The G8 summit meets every year over a weekend in the summer. It brings together the Presidents of the United States and France; the Chancellor of Germany; and the Prime Ministers of Japan, the United Kingdom, Italy and Canada, together with the European Union (Commission and presidency) and, since 1998, the President of Russia. Each G8 member acts in turn as summit host while holding the summit presidency, always in the same order: France, US, UK, Germany, Japan, Italy and Canada – Russia has not yet hosted a summit. The G8 has no headquarters or staff of its own, so all of the responsibility for preparing and holding the summit falls to the country holding the presidency for the year. That gives the host country an unusual opportunity to influence the direction of international economic and political decision making, and most G8 members use this opportunity to the full.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.704
Threshold uncertainty score0.610

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueItalian PoliticsSame topicRegional Development and PolicyFrench-language works237,207