Dioxin-like Potency of HO- and MeO- Analogues of PBDEs’ the Potential Risk through Consumption of Fish from Eastern China
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) and their analogues, such as hydroxylated PBDE (HO-PBDEs) and methoxylated PBDE (MeO-PBDEs) are of interest due to their wide distribution, bioaccumulation and potential toxicity to humans and wildlife. While information on the toxicity/biological potencies of PBDEs was available, information on analogues of PBDEs was limited. Dioxin-like toxicity of 34 PBDEs analogues was evaluated by use of the H4IIE-luc, rat hepatoma transactivation bioassay in 384-well plate format at concentrations ranging from 0 to 10 000 ng/mL. Among the 34 target analogues of PBDEs studied here, 19 activated the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) and induced significant dioxin-like responses in H4IIE-luc cells. Efficacies of the analogues of PBDEs ranged from 5.0% to 101.8% of the maximum response caused by 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD-max) and their respective 2,3,7,8-TCDD potency factors (ReP(H4IIE-luc)) ranged from 7.35 × 10(-12) to 4.00 × 10(-4), some of which were equal to or more potent than some mono-ortho-substituted PCBs (TEF-(WHO) = 3 × 10(-5)). HO-PBDEs exhibited greater dioxin-like activity than did the corresponding MeO-PBDEs. Analogues of PBDEs were detected mostly in marine organisms. Of these 11 detected analogues of PBDEs, 6 were found to have measurable dioxin-like potency. Though some analogues of PBDEs exhibited significant dioxin-like potency as measured by responses of the H4IIE-luc transactivation assay, concentrations of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) equivalents ((PBDEs analogues)TEQ(H4IIE-luc)), calculated as the sum of the product of concentrations of individual PBDE and their ReP(H4IIE-luc), were less than the tolerance limit proposed by European Union and the oral reference dose (RfD) derived by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, respectively. (Hazard Quotients (HQ) < 0.005) Additional investigations should be conducted to evaluate the toxic potencies of these chemicals, especially for 2'-MeO-BDE-28, 4-HO-BDE-90, 6-HO-BDE-47, and 6-MeO-BDE-47, which had been detected in other environmental media, including human blood.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".