MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2318857301 · doi:10.1021/jp503708d

Ultrafast Triplet Formation in Thionated Perylene Diimides

2014· article· en· W2318857301 on OpenAlexaff
Andrew J. Tilley, Ryan D. Pensack, Tia S. Lee, Brandon Djukic, Gregory D. Scholes, Dwight S. Seferos

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry C · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPerovskite Materials and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPeryleneIntersystem crossingUltrafast laser spectroscopyTriplet statePhotochemistryChemistrySinglet stateExcited stateAbsorption (acoustics)SpectroscopyMaterials scienceMoleculeOrganic chemistryAtomic physicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Perylene diimides (PDIs) are versatile n-type materials showing great promise in a number of optoelectronic applications. While the singlet manifold of PDI can be readily populated, triplet excited states are only accessible through complex multistep energy cascades or bimolecular sensitization. In this work, we have synthesized a series of thionated PDIs that display rapid intersystem crossing to triplet states. Significantly, the thionated PDIs are synthesized in one step from the parent compound using commercially available Lawesson’s reagent. Electrochemical and steady state optical absorption measurements show that the electron affinity and ionization potentials can be systematically tuned through successive sulfur atom substitution. Thin-film optical absorption measurements show how the number and regiochemistry of the thiocarbonyl groups influence π–π interactions in the solid state. Ultrafast transient absorption spectroscopy reveals rapid triplet formation that is independent of the degree of thionation, highlighting this approach as a facile means of accessing the triplet manifold of PDI.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.152

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations154
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry CSame topicPerovskite Materials and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207