MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Modèle du lieu en design d’interaction

2018· article· fr· W2318866418 on OpenAlex
Éric Kavanagh, Jacynthe Roberge

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInterfaces numériques · 2018
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldEngineering
TopicSpatial Cognition and Navigation
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Siège des activités humaines, le lieu est d’une grande importance en design d’interaction. Investi de sens, de valeurs, de conventions et d’attentes, le lieu se définit au-delà de sa nature physique. C’est aussi une réalité complexe, aux dimensions multiples, qui exerce une réelle influence sur nos interactions et nos comportements. Pour plusieurs raisons, le lieu demeure une notion très ardue à appréhender en design d’interaction. Cette difficulté prive trop souvent les interfaces d’une réelle convivialité, caractéristique déterminante de la réussite d’une relation entre humain et interface. Nous posons une réflexion sur les principaux lieux de l’interaction humain-interface et proposons un modèle des éléments à considérer pour la prise en compte d’un lieu particulièrement riche et complexe : le lieu psychologique.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.718
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it