MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2318867598 · doi:10.1021/jp111812k

Spectroscopic and Theoretical Study of the Weakly Bound H<sub>2</sub>−HCCCN Dimer

2011· article· en· W2318867598 on OpenAlexaff
Julie M. Michaud, Wendy C. Topic, Wolfgang Jäger

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry A · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicMolecular Spectroscopy and Structure
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIsotopologueChemistryHyperfine structureMoleculeDimerAtomic physicsQuadrupoleProtonMolecular physicsPotential energy surfacePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rotational spectra of the H(2)-HCCCN complex were studied using a pulsed-nozzle Fourier transform microwave spectrometer. Complexes containing the main and several minor isotopologues of cyanoacetylene (HCCC(15)N, DCCCN, and various (13)C containing isotopologues) and the two spin isomers of the H(2) molecule (paraH(2) and orthoH(2)) were investigated. Transitions of complexes with (14)N and D containing isotopologues have nuclear quadrupole hyperfine structures, which were measured and analyzed. Transitions of orthoH(2) molecule containing complexes show additional hyperfine structures due to nuclear magnetic proton spin-proton spin coupling of the hydrogen nuclei in the H(2) molecule. For orthoH(2)-HCCCN, both strong a- and weaker b-type transitions were measured and analyzed using a semirigid asymmetric rotor model. For the paraH(2)-HCCCN complex, only a-type transitions could be observed. The dimer complexes are floppy and have near T-shaped structures. Intermolecular interaction potential energy surfaces were calculated for H(2)-HCCCN using the coupled-cluster method with single and double excitations and noniterative inclusion of triple excitations [CCSD(T)]. Three orientations of the hydrogen molecule within the complex were considered. Equal weighting of the surfaces corresponding to the three hydrogen orientations provided an averaged potential energy surface. Bound-state rotational energy levels supported by the surfaces were determined for the different hydrogen orientations, as well as for the averaged surface. Simple scaling of the surfaces improved the agreement with the experimental results and produced surfaces with near spectroscopic accuracy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.425

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry ASame topicMolecular Spectroscopy and StructureFrench-language works237,207