MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2318916897 · doi:10.3130/aijt.16.1003

FIRE EXPERIMENT ON HORIZONTALLY ARRANGED EXTERNAL LOUVER FOR INTEGRATED FAÇADE

2010· article· en· W2318916897 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAIJ Journal of Technology and Design · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicUrban and spatial planning
Canadian institutionsArup Group (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLouverFacadePlumeFire safetyEnvironmental scienceEngineeringMarine engineeringStructural engineeringMeteorologyMechanical engineeringCivil engineeringGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The building facade plays important role for not only appearance designs, but also the safety and the environmental impacts. For satisfying these demands, the authors have proposed the integrated facade system using horizontally arranged louvers. Considering the safety, not only the structural aspect but also fire safety is important. Especially verification of the ejected plume behavior from opening is important to prevent fire spread. The full scale fire experiment, which attached opening with the louver system, was carried out. The ejected plum behavior from this opening was confirmed through temperature around opening and louver, shape of plume, and radiated heat.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.110
Threshold uncertainty score0.284

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it