A reliability study of square wave bursting $\beta$-cells with noise
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Reliability of spike timing has been a hot topic recently. Howeverreliability has not been considered for bursting behavior, ascommonly observed in a variety of nerve and endocrine cells,including $\beta$-cells in intact pancreatic islets. In this paper,reliability of $\beta$-cells with noise is considered. A method tonumerically study reliability of bursting cells is presented.Reliability of a single cell will decrease as noise level becomeslarger. The reliability of networks of $\beta$-cells coupled by gapjunctions or synaptic excitation is investigated. Simulations of thenetwork of $\beta$-cells reveal that increasing noise leveldecreases the reliability. But the reliability of the network ishigher than that of single cell. The effect of coupling strength onreliability is also investigated. Reliability will decrease whencoupling strength is small and increase when coupling strength islarge.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it