Doxazosin selectively potentiates contraction to serotonin via 5-HT<sub>2A</sub>receptors in longitudinal muscle strips of the rabbit gastric body
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The aims of this study were to examine the effects of doxazosin on contractile responses to 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT), carbachol, and histamine, and to compare them with those of prazosin, alfuzosin, and terazosin, and then characterize a pharmacological profile of the 5-HT-induced contractile response using preparations of isolated longitudinal muscle strips from the rabbit gastric body. The results from these preparations showed that the contraction response to 5-HT, but not to carbachol or histamine, was found to be dose-dependently potentiated by doxazosin and its enantiomers. The specific potentiation effect on 5-HT was not observed in the preparations that were treated with prazosin, terazosin, or alfuzosin. The contractile response to 5-HT and its potentiation by doxazosin were not affected by treatment with phenoxybenzamine. However, 5-HT-induced contraction was competitively antagonized by nefazodone (with pA₂ value of 8.64 ± 0.17), and was almost completely inhibited by treatment with indomethacin. In conclusion, doxazosin, but not prazosin, alfuzosin, or terazosin, selectively potentiates 5-HT-induced contraction in the rabbit gastric body strips via an α₁-adrenoceptor-independent mechanism, without chiral recognition of its enantiomers. Additionally, the contraction to 5-HT was found to be mediated via 5-HT(₂) receptors, and was similar to PGs synthesis in the preparations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".