End-Group Functionalization of Poly(3-hexylthiophene) as an Efficient Route to Photosensitize Nanocrystalline TiO<sub>2</sub> Films for Photovoltaic Applications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Bulk heterojunction (BHJ) and dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs) have seen increased popularity over recent years and each technology has experienced tremendous improvements in power conversion efficiencies (PCEs), reaching 8 and 12%, respectively. The two technologies have been on independent improvement pathways, and this work establishes a link between them by using the archetypical hole conductor (poly-3-hexylthiophene, P3HT) in BHJs as a sensitizer on TiO(2) for DSSC applications. Three polymers were synthesized and examined as potential TiO(2) sensitizers in DSSCs under AM1.5 solar radiation. Using Grignard metathesis, regioregular P3HT was synthesized then functionalized with either one or two cyanoacrylic acid linker moieties to bind to the TiO(2) surface. End-group modification resulted in minimal changes to the optical and electronic properties as compared to pristine P3HT. Cyclic voltammetry (CV) experiments at anodic potentials of adsorbed sensitizer quantified the amount of alkylthiophene adsorbed on the TiO(2), whereas under reductive sweeps, cyanoacrylic acid end-group binding was determined. CVs of each polymer indicated that loading was drastically different as compared to pristine P3HT with the lowest loading on TiO(2) and monofunctionalized P3HT exhibited the highest loading. The DSSCs showed power conversion efficiencies (PCEs) of 0.1%, 0.2 and 2.2% for the polymer-sensitized TiO(2) of the unfunctionalized, monofunctionalized and difunctionalized polymers, respectively. DSSCs were then subjected to electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) in the dark and under monochromatic light radiation. The large variance in performance for the functionalized-P3HT sensitizers is attributed to differences in the adsorption modes of sensitizer on the TiO(2) surface, which in the difunctionalized case limits electrolyte recombination and favors forward charge transfer reactions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".