MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2319047305 · doi:10.2514/6.2014-4263

Vision-based Pose and Motion Estimation of Non-cooperative Target for Space Robotic Manipulators

2014· article· en· W2319047305 on OpenAlexafffund
Gangqi Dong, Zheng Zhu

Bibliographic record

VenueAIAA SPACE 2014 Conference and Exposition · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobotics and Sensor-Based Localization
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Center for Theoretical Sciences
KeywordsComputer visionArtificial intelligencePoseKalman filterComputer scienceOptical flowMotion estimationExtended Kalman filterPhotogrammetry3D pose estimationConvergence (economics)Image (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper developed a real-time vision-based pose and motion estimation of noncooperative target by extended Kalman filter. Optical flow algorithm was adopted to track the feature points of the target in order to increase the imaging processing speed. In addition, photogrammetry was used to provide more accurate initial conditions as well as accelerate the convergence rate of the extended Kalman filter. The proposed scheme has been implemented by a single camera to estimate the pose and motion of a static and dynamic target experimentally. The estimated results were compared with that of photogrammetry and demonstrated that the proposed scheme is robust and accurate in pose and motion estimation from noisy images.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAIAA SPACE 2014 Conference and ExpositionSame topicRobotics and Sensor-Based LocalizationFrench-language works237,207