Photoluminescence saturation independent of excitation pathway in air-suspended single-walled carbon nanotubes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Photoluminescence (PL) spectroscopy is a useful probe of excitonic interactions in optically excited nanostructures. Under intense optical excitation, the diffusion-annihilation of excitons in single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) results in strong nonlinear PL. This behavior has been observed in a number of samples and has, until recently, been believed to be independent of excitation pathway. Contrary to this assumption, recent studies show that nonlinear PL in encapsulated SWCNTs, excited resonant to ${\mathrm{E}}_{22}$, is not dominated by diffusion-annihilation but instead by laser induced quenching sites. In this paper, we show that, unlike encapsulated SWCNTs, air-suspended SWCNT PL saturation is independent of excitation pathway, validating the use of a diffusion model for excitons generated via ${\mathrm{E}}_{22}$ excitation. In addition, we show that the diffusion of excitons in air-suspended SWCNTs is independent of atmospheric adsorbates, strengthening the assertion that in this system exciton diffusion is intrinsic and not disorder limited.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".