MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2319175454 · doi:10.1177/002070201206700222

Review: Jean Monnet and Canada <i>Early Travels and the Idea of European Unity</i>

2012· article· en· W2319175454 on OpenAlexaffabout
Charles Pentland

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal Canada s Journal of Global Policy Analysis · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPower (physics)European unionSurpriseSociologyEconomic historyPolitical scienceLawPolitical economyHistoryEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

JEAN MONNET AND CANADA Early Travels and the Idea of European Unity Trygve U gland Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2011. 109 pp, $29.95 (doth) ISBN 978-1-4426-4310-9Jean Monnet (1888-1979) was not one to let a good crisis go to waste. No surprise, then, that the European Union's seemingly endless agony over the euro should have led many to ask what counsel this tireless and creative founding father of European would offer today's leaders. A believer in the power, durability, and accumulated wisdom of institutions, Monnet might well press them to seize the moment, follow the logic of integration, and take another bold step in the direction of supranational economic governance. But he would then immediately confront the living legacy ofthat rival Frenchman, Charles de Gaulle, whose insistence on the primacy of national governments is reflected in the Merkozy partnership that has shaped Europe's response to its financial crisis.The persistent vitality of Monnet' s ideas is reason enough to continue exploring their origins. That is one attraction of Trygve U gland' s brief but lively account of Monnet' s early years - a narrative that traces the roots of his innovative, pragmatic theory of European back through his in international business, the League of Nations, and the promotion of inter-allied cooperation in both world wars. A second attraction, particularly for readers, is Ugland's thesis that Monnet's travels in Canada prior to World War I much of his thinking about designing institutions and getting things done in international relations.A Norwegian-born political scientist at Bishop's University, Ugland covers a great deal of ground in this book. His earlier work on the state control of alcohol, combined with a passion for Europe, drew him naturally to Monnet, whose family produced a prominent brand of cognac. Not yet 20, Monnet was first dispatched to Winnipeg in 1907 to develop a market for it. Until 1914 he returned repeatedly, visiting most of the country and establishing privileged, profitable ties with the Hudson's Bay Company as the distributor of Monnet cognac. Ugland argues that Monnet's Canadian school of experience (49) was the source of the personal theoretical code that inspired and spurred him to promote European integration (9-11).Monnet's impressions from these early visits to Canada were undoubtedly seminal. His exposure to the west in him visions of progress, expansion, organization and - not least - a working federal system. Two subsequent engagements with Canada reinforced his ideas about practical international cooperation. First, during World War I he arranged for the Hudson's Bay Company to become the French government's purchasing agent for food, raw materials, and manufactured goods - a supply system then extended to several other allies. Monnet's next transatlantic venture was a scheme hatched in 1938 to evade America's neutrality act by assembling military aircraft in Canada from components shipped across the border from American factories. Their destiny was the French air force, desperate to counter the growing threat of the Luftwaffe. In all of these commercial and diplomatic enterprises, Canada was for Monnet an indispensable link. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.865
Threshold uncertainty score0.268

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.009
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0070.005
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0050.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal Canada s Journal of Global Policy AnalysisSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207