MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2319183820 · doi:10.1021/jp503410j

Identification of Surface Defects and Subsurface Dopants in a Delta-Doped System Using Simultaneous nc-AFM/STM and DFT

2014· article· en· W2319183820 on OpenAlexafffund
Evan J. Spadafora, J. A. Berger, Pingo Mutombo, Mykola Telychko, Martin Švec, Zsolt Majzik, A. B. McLean, Pavel Jelı́nek

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry C · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicForce Microscopy Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaGrantová Agentura České Republiky
KeywordsScanning tunneling microscopeDopantKelvin probe force microscopeDangling bondDopingAtomic force microscopyVacancy defectMaterials scienceBilayerChemistrySurface reconstructionSurface (topology)Chemical physicsMolecular physicsCrystallographyNanotechnologyOptoelectronicsSiliconMembraneGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We have studied the near surface defects of the delta-doped B:Si(111)-(√3 × √3)R30° system using a combination of scanning tunneling microscopy, non-contact atomic force microscopy, Kelvin probe force spectroscopy, total energy DFT, and STM theoretical simulations. We positively identify and characterize two near surface defects: the adatom vacancy and a B substitutional defect located in the second Si bilayer. We also confirm the assignment of the dangling-bond defect. Additionally, the influence that the subsurface B dopants have on the surface electronic structure, the modulation of the surface potential and the chemical activity of the surface is investigated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.063
Threshold uncertainty score0.293

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry CSame topicForce Microscopy Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207