Effect of Clathrate Hydrate Formation and Decomposition on NMR Parameters in THF–D<sub>2</sub>O Solution
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The NMR spin-lattice relaxation time (T(1)), spin-spin relaxation time (T(2)) and the diffusion coefficient D were measured for (1)H in a 1:17 mol % solution of tetrahydrofuran (THF) in D(2)O. The aim of the work was to clarify some earlier points raised regarding the utility of these measurements to convey structural information on hydrate formation and reformation. A number of irregularities in T(1) and T(2) measurements during hydrate processes reported earlier are explained in terms of the presence of interfaces and possible temperature gradients. We observe that T(1) and T(2) in solution are exactly the same before and after hydrate formation, thus confirming that the solution is isotropic. This is inconsistent with the presence of memory effects, at least those that may affect the dynamics to which T(1) and T(2) are sensitive. The measurement of the diffusion coefficient for a number of hours in the subcooled solution before nucleation proved invariant with time, again suggesting that the solution remains isotropic without affecting the guest dynamics and diffusion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".