MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2319262025 · doi:10.4011/shikizai.85.172

Recent Technical Trends of Automotive Painting

2012· article· en· W2319262025 on OpenAlexaff
Masaru Terada

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Japan Society of Colour Material · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicManufacturing Process and Optimization
Canadian institutionsABB (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAutomotive industryPaintingComputer scienceEngineeringArtVisual artsAerospace engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

最近の自動車塗装技術の動向について,塗装機,塗装ロボットと制御システムについて述べた。今日の塗装技術に対してさらなる環境負荷の低減が求められており,塗装ブース面積の縮小化と多色化に柔軟に対応する塗装システムが求められている。塗装機においては,エアモータの高性能化による塗料の大吐出量化,塗料のオーバースプレー量を大幅に削減できるパターン制御技術,塗装ブース面積の縮小化と多色化を実現できる洗浄機能付カートリッジ,および塗装機に飛散した塗料粒子が付着することを防ぐ汚れ防止機構について述べた。塗装ロボットにおいては,可動範囲の広い壁掛け式ロボットと,本ロボットが可能にするブースの省面積化について述べた。制御システムにおいては,一般的な機器構成,制御方式および機器のもつ遅れの補正について述べた。

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.060

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Japan Society of Colour MaterialSame topicManufacturing Process and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207