MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2319268496 · doi:10.1021/jp405095e

Phase Transitions and Phase Miscibility of Mixed Particles of Ammonium Sulfate, Toluene-Derived Secondary Organic Material, and Water

2013· article· en· W2319268496 on OpenAlexaff
M. L. Smith, Yuan You, Mikinori Kuwata, Allan K. Bertram, Scot T. Martin

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry A · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicAtmospheric chemistry and aerosols
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMiscibilityToluenePhase (matter)Ammonium sulfateMaterials scienceChemical engineeringAmmoniumChemistryOrganic chemistryPolymerComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The phase states of atmospheric particles influence their roles in physicochemical processes related to air quality and climate. The phases of particles containing secondary organic materials (SOMs) are still uncertain, especially for SOMs produced from aromatic precursor gases. In this work, efflorescence and deliquescence phase transitions, as well as phase separation, in particles composed of toluene-derived SOM, ammonium sulfate, and water were studied by hygroscopic tandem differential mobility analysis (HTDMA) and optical microscopy. The SOM was produced in the Harvard Environmental Chamber by photo-oxidation of toluene at chamber relative humidities of <5 and 40%. The efflorescence and deliquescence relative humidities (ERH and DRH, respectively, studied by HTDMA) of ammonium sulfate decreased as the SOM organic fraction ε in the particle increased, dropping from DRH = 80% and ERH = 31% for ε = 0.0 to DRH = 58% and ERH = 0% for ε = 0.8. For ε < 0.2, the DRH and ERH to first approximation did not change with the organic volume fraction. This observation is consistent with independent behaviors for ε < 0.2 of water-infused toluene-derived SOM and aqueous ammonium sulfate, suggesting phase immiscibility between the two. Optical microscopy of particles prepared for ε = 0.12 confirmed phase separation for RH < 85%. For ε from 0.2 to 0.8, the DRH and ERH values steadily decreased, as studied by HTDMA. This result is consistent with one-phase mixing of ammonium sulfate, SOM, and water. Optical microscopy for particles of ε = 0.8 confirmed this result. Within error, increased exposure times of the aerosol in the HTDMA from 0.5 to 30 s affected neither the ERH(ε) nor DRH(ε) curves, implying an absence of kinetic effects on the observations over the studied time scales. For ε > 0.5, the DRH values of ammonium sulfate in mixtures with SOM produced at <5% RH were offset by -3 to -5% RH compared to the results for SOM produced at 40% RH, suggesting differences in SOM chemistry. The observed miscibility gap (i.e., phase separation) between toluene-derived SOM and aqueous ammonium sulfate across a limited range of organic volume fractions differentiates this SOM from previous reports for isoprene-derived SOM of full miscibility and for α-pinene-derived SOM of nearly full immiscibility with aqueous ammonium sulfate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations49
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry ASame topicAtmospheric chemistry and aerosolsFrench-language works237,207