High Lift-to-Drag Ratio Waveriders for Missions in the Martian Atmosphere
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An exploratory study has been performed on applying modern, high lift-to-drag ratio waveriders to a number of missions in and through the atmosphere of Mars. Earlier studies have most commonly employed lower lift-to-drag ratio conical-based waverider designs. The recent Osculating Flowfield Waverider Method can generate vehicles with greater aerodynamic performance than those from earlier methods. This improved waverider performance has favorable impacts for most of the examined missions. Waverider vehicles have been applied to a variety of missions including, aero-gravity assist during fly-bys, aerobraking for orbit capture, lifting entry from entry interface to landing, lifting ascents of return vehicles such as for sample-return missions, and boost-glide missions for travel from one surface location to another. The greater lift-to-drag ratio available from modern waveriders is a significant enhancer for most of the missions examined where this ratio has a positive influence.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it