MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2319289633 · doi:10.1021/jp3040743

Visible Emission from GeO<sub>2</sub> Nanowires: Site-Specific Insights via X-ray Excited Optical Luminescence

2012· article· en· W2319289633 on OpenAlexaff
Lidia Armelao, F. Heigl, Pil-Sook Grace Kim, R. A. Rosenberg, Tom Regier, Tsun‐Kong Sham

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry C · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSemiconductor materials and devices
Canadian institutionsUniversity of SaskatchewanMcMaster UniversityCanadian Light Source (Canada)Brockhouse Institute for Materials ResearchWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLuminescenceNanowireMaterials scienceExcited stateGermanium oxideSubstrate (aquarium)OptoelectronicsOxideAbsorption (acoustics)GermaniumAtomic physicsSiliconPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Crystalline GeO 2 nanowires synthesized by a flow deposition technique on a silica substrate emit intense and distinct luminescence. X-ray Excited Optical Luminescence (XEOL) stimulated by a synchrotron light source in the soft X-ray energy regime was used to monitor the optical emission from germanium oxide nanowires upon X-ray absorption with the excitation energy tuned across O K- and Ge L 3,2 -edges. XEOL spectra vary significantly at different edges. At the O K-edge, luminescence is characterized by green (∼520 nm) and red (∼780 nm) emission related to oxygen vacancies in the core of the nanowires and to structural defects on their surface. At the Ge L 3,2 -edge, emission is dominated by an intense violet peak at ∼400 nm mostly associated with defect centers at the interface between adjacent nanowires and with the silica substrate. The increasing attenuation lengths of soft X-rays tuned at excitation energies across the O K-edge (∼300 nm) and the Ge L 3,2 -edge (∼1 μm) enable the sampling of defects placed at different depths in the nanosized GeO 2 structures, down to the nanowire–SiO 2 interface. The use of tunable XEOL makes it possible to correlate excitation energy with the site-specific origin of luminescence and has provided direct evidence for the behavior of different structural defects in the visible emission from the GeO 2 nanowires. These results are of key interest to exploit the nanodimensional oxides in practical device applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.577

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry CSame topicSemiconductor materials and devicesFrench-language works237,207