Bibliographic record
Abstract
Après l’art du logiciel, les installations interactives et/ou immersives vidéo-projetées et l’art Internet, les technologies mobiles (GPS, tablettes, téléphones portables, etc.) sont à leur tour au cœur des réflexions et de la création artistique, et ce depuis le début des années 2000. Les particularités de ces appareils reposent pour l’essentiel sur leur capacité à générer, reproduire, recevoir et/ou échanger des informations en temps réel et à distance. Ils impliquent ainsi inévitablement un autre rapport au monde et à l’espace (réel), en s’inscrivant dans ce qu’il est désormais courant d’appeler la « Réalité Mixte ». À travers l’analyse de Can You See Me Now ? (Blast Theory, 2001), nous proposons une réflexion sur les modalités d’échanges informationnels entre espace « réel » et espace « virtuel » et leur valeur discursive au sein de l’œuvre, mais aussi entre l’espace mixte constitutif de l’œuvre et celui de son exposition.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.013 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.037 | 0.011 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".