MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Can You See Me Now? 

2018· article· fr· W2319299298 on OpenAlex
Sophie Morand

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInterfaces numériques · 2018
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldComputer Science
TopicCultural Insights and Digital Impacts
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtESPACEPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Après l’art du logiciel, les installations interactives et/ou immersives vidéo-projetées et l’art Internet, les technologies mobiles (GPS, tablettes, téléphones portables, etc.) sont à leur tour au cœur des réflexions et de la création artistique, et ce depuis le début des années 2000. Les particularités de ces appareils reposent pour l’essentiel sur leur capacité à générer, reproduire, recevoir et/ou échanger des informations en temps réel et à distance. Ils impliquent ainsi inévitablement un autre rapport au monde et à l’espace (réel), en s’inscrivant dans ce qu’il est désormais courant d’appeler la « Réalité Mixte ». À travers l’analyse de Can You See Me Now ? (Blast Theory, 2001), nous proposons une réflexion sur les modalités d’échanges informationnels entre espace « réel » et espace « virtuel » et leur valeur discursive au sein de l’œuvre, mais aussi entre l’espace mixte constitutif de l’œuvre et celui de son exposition.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.593
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.155
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.171 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it