MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2319327200 · doi:10.3749/canmin.50.2.295

CUPROMAKOPAVONITE, Cu8Ag3Pb4Bi19S38, A NEW MINERAL SPECIES, ITS CRYSTAL STRUCTURE AND THE CUPROPAVONITE HOMOLOGOUS SERIES

2012· article· en· W2319327200 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Dan Topa, Emil Makovicky, Gheorghe Ilinca, Herbert Dittrich

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Mineralogist · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCrystal Structures and Properties
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHomologous seriesCrystallographyMonoclinic crystal systemChemistryCrystal structureElectron microprobeMineralQuartzMetalMineralogyAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Materials scienceMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cupromakopavonite, ideally Cu8Ag3Pb4Bi19S38, is a new mineral species found in quartz veins at the scheelite deposit Felbertal, Salzburg Province, Austria. It is associated with makovickyite, oversubstituted krupkaite ( bd 55), hodrusite, and kupcikite. The mineral is opaque and grey with a metallic luster; it is brittle without any discernible cleavage. In reflected light, it is greyish white, the bireflectance is weak, and the anisotropy is moderate in air and strong in oil. Internal reflections are absent. The reflectance data (%, air) are: 42.9, 46.6 at 470 nm, 42.1, 46.5 at 546 nm, 41.3, 45.8 at 589 nm and 40.2, 45.1 at 650 nm. The average results of 15 electron-microprobe analyses are: Cu 7.29(6), Ag 5.48(4), Pb 8.84(14), Cd 0.39(6), Bi 59.9(2), S 17.90(6), total 99.80(23) wt.%, corresponding to Cu7.82Ag3.46Pb2.91Cd0.24Bi19.53S38.05 (on the basis of Me + S = 72 apfu ). The simplified formula, Cu8Ag3Pb4Bi19S38, is in accordance with the results of our crystal-structure analysis. The density, 6.85 g/cm3, was calculated using the ideal (structural) formula. Cupromakopavonite has a monoclinic cell with a 13.380(2), b 4.0007(6), c 31.083(4) A, β 93.064(2)°, V 1661.5(4) A3, space group C 2/ m , and Z = 1. The strongest eight lines in the (calculated) powder-diffraction pattern [ d in A(I) hkl ] are: 3.607(57)(207), 3.457(99)(114), 3.436(37)(208), 3.340(34)(401), 2.953(28)(311), 2.874(33) (2010), 2.834(100)(313) and 2.256(29)(1111). The crystal structure was refined to R = 4.53% and wR = 6.0% for 1834 reflections [ F o > 4σ( F o )]. Our crystal-structure determination reveals that the unusually high value of the c parameter results from: (1) regular alternation of pavonite-like N = 4 and N = 5 layers in the structure, (2) regularly oriented distribution of the pairs of Bi pyramids and pairs of Pb–Bi prisms in the thin slabs of the structure, and (3) the appearance of a new three-coordinated Cu site instead of the octahedrally coordinated Ag site in the thin slabs. Cupromakopavonite is the N = 4.5 member of the newly defined cupropavonite homologous series, and its name underscores its close structural relationships to its two neighboring members, cupromakovickyite (N = 4) and cupropavonite (N = 5). We define the structural and chemical properties of this series, with the general, ideal formula, Cu8Ag2N−6Pb4Bi2N+10S4N+20 for Z = 1, where N is the order of the homologue. It includes N = 7 (“cuproplumbian benjaminite”) and N = 8 (“cuproplumbian mummeite”).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian MineralogistSame topicCrystal Structures and PropertiesFrench-language works237,207