Catalytic Conversion of Biomass by Natural Gas for Oil Quality Upgrading
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The development of an economically attractive process with abundant and readily available raw feedstocks to achieve the upgrading of biomass is highly desirable. Unlike conventional fast pyrolysis followed by hydrotreating for upgraded bio-oil production under high pressure in which expensive and naturally unavailable hydrogen is heavily engaged, this work clearly demonstrates the feasibility of upgrading biomass by directly using cheap natural gas on zeolite-supported catalyst at atmospheric pressure. The introduction of methane during biomass pyrolysis not only increased the yield of the collected oil from 6.79 to 7.48 wt % but also improved its quality in terms of higher H/C ratio, from 1.21 to 1.71, under the facilitation of Ag/ZSM-5 catalyst. A synergistic effect was clearly observed among methane, biomass pyrolysis, and catalyst, which contributed to the exciting performance. This novel process can be extended to the conversion of coals, other biomass, and heavy oil to more valuable products.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".