The Effect of Blade Leading Edge Platform Shape on Upstream Disk Cavity to Mainstream Flow Interaction of a High-Pressure Turbine Stage
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents a CFD study of a transonic highpressure 1-stage turbine that includes the blade upstream disk cavity. The emphasis of the analysis was to understand and quantify the impact of the blade leading edge platform shape on the flow interaction between the upstream disk cavity flow and the gaspath mainstream flow. Two blade platform shapes were analyzed: a recessed and a raised leading edge shape. The results presented include steadystate and transient simulations in order to describe the flow interaction and quantify the impact on stage efficiency. A sensitivity analysis on the amount of cavity flow was performed to investigate the impact on secondary losses (interpreted by entropy generation) and stage efficiency. It was found that the blade leading edge platform shape and cavity flow amount affected the blade hub passage vortex structure and location. At the nominal engine condition, the raised leading edge platform shape showed an improvement in stage efficiency. It also showed a reduced sensitivity of stage efficiency due to cavity flow amount.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it