MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2319351309 · doi:10.1097/ans.0b013e3181dbc56b

Narratives of “Dissonance” and “Repositioning” Through the Lens of Critical Humanism

2010· article· en· W2319351309 on OpenAlexaffabout
Joan M. Anderson, Joanne Chekryn Reimer, Koushambhi Basu Khan, Laura Simich, Anne Neufeld, Moira Stewart, Edward Makwarimba

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in Nursing Science · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicPrimary Care and Health Outcomes
Canadian institutionsSocial Sciences and Humanities Research CouncilUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of British Columbia Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCognitive dissonanceNarrativeHumanismFocus (optics)PsychologyAestheticsSocial psychologySociologyEpistemologyCognitive psychologyPolitical scienceArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The focus of this article is on narratives of "starting over," and the embedded processes, conceptualized as "dissonance"--between what people had expected to find in Canada and their actual experiences, and "repositioning"--how they subsequently restructured their lives and redefined their identities. This narrative analysis is one way of illuminating the complex ways in which social support networks influence dissonance and repositioning, and subsequently influence health and well-being.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.291
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.502
Teacher spread0.472 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvances in Nursing ScienceSame topicPrimary Care and Health OutcomesFrench-language works237,207