MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2319391825 · doi:10.21000/jasmr06021156

MEASUREMENT OF OXYGEN CONSUMPTION AND DIFFUSION IN EXPOSED AND COVERED REACTIVE MINE TAILINGS

2006· article· en· W2319391825 on OpenAlexafffund
Vincent Martin, Michel Aubertin, Bruno Bussière, Mamert Mbonimpa, Anne-Marie Dagenais, Mathieu Gosselin

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal American Society of Mining and Reclamation · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMine drainage and remediation techniques
Canadian institutionsAgnico Eagle (Canada)Polytechnique MontréalUniversité du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsTailingsDiffusionOxygenConsumption (sociology)Mining engineeringEnvironmental scienceGeologyMetallurgyMaterials scienceChemistryArtThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

When sulphidic tailings are exposed to atmospheric conditions, oxygen can flow in the material where it will be consumed by oxidation reactions. This paper presents results from a project studying the in situ oxygen diffusion and consumption in tailings. It provides measured values for the oxygen reaction rate K r and the effective diffusion D e coefficients based on oxygen consumption and diffusion tests that are performed under various conditions. Based on the test results, the K r and D e values determined in situ are compared to values obtained through simple predictive models. Results indicate that the value of these two parameters is influenced by factors such as the degree of saturation S r and in situ porosity n. A lower S r or a higher n may increase the oxygen flux toward the reactive tailings, which can increase the production rate of acid mine drainage (AMD).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.826
Threshold uncertainty score0.191

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal American Society of Mining and ReclamationSame topicMine drainage and remediation techniquesFrench-language works237,207