Patients' Survey on Regular Check-up System in Dental Clinics.
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This survey classified the issues involved in promoting the regular check-up system in dental clinics. The survey was conducted in two parts: interviews with 39 dental clinics and a questionnaire survey of 5,129 patients (response rate: 56.8%). The results are summarized as follows: 1. Among the dental clinics that participated in this survey, the proportion of regular patients, the number of dental hygienists working at clinics, and the number of patients per day were higher than those of the national average. 2. The demographic patterns of regularly attending patients were "female, aged under 14 years and students or public servants". 3. Satisfaction with the technical competence of hygienists has the strongest correlation with regularity of visiting. The degree of correlation was about twice that of the correlation with technical competence of the dentist. 4. Patients' priorities for improving dental services to enhance satisfaction were treatment charges, appointment system, and attitude of staff and doctors toward welcoming the patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it