MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2319417724 · doi:10.1061/9780784479315.005

Massive Ice and Ice-Rich Soil Detection by Gravimetric Surveying at Dry Creek, Southwestern Yukon Territory, Canada

2015· article· en· W2319417724 on OpenAlexaffabout
Benoit Loranger, Guy Doré, Daniel Fortier, Chantal Lemieux

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicClimate change and permafrost
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyGravimetric analysisBoreholePermafrostFluvialDrillingGeomorphologyGeotechnical engineeringOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Gravity measurements were made using a Scintrex CG-5 Autograv gravimeter in permafrost terrain conditions where bodies of buried ice were expected. The main objective was to assess the feasibility of using gravimetric technology to detect massive ice bodies at Dry Creek, Yukon Territory, Canada. Tests at 11 gravimetric survey lines and 10 boreholes were performed during the summers of 2013 and 2014. Residual anomaly profiles provide a quick first estimate of the amount of ice in underlying soil strata. A mean anomaly of −0.10 mGal was found near a thermokarst, south of the Dry Creek rest area along the Alaska Highway. The cryostratigraphy comprises at depth an ice-rich diamicton covered by massive ice with suspended silty inclusions and an overlying layer of glacio-fluvial gravel. At the base of a small glacio-fluvial hill deposit, on the southeast side of the road, a mean anomaly of −0.260 mGal was found. A massive ice body of 9.3 m of maximum thickness was drilled through. Since drilling is planned after gravimetric surveys, it is possible to assess whether or not this technique is effective for detecting sub-surface ice features. This paper presents an overview of the site, the gravimetric detection technique employed, and gravimetric and borehole test results and analysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.073
Threshold uncertainty score0.146

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicClimate change and permafrost→French-language works237,207→