MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2319450490 · doi:10.1177/003172170008200320

Sad, Bad, Mad: Responding to <i>the Health of Canada's Children</i>

2000· article· en· W2319450490 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhi Delta Kappan · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicSchool Health and Nursing Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyMental healthMedia studiesSociologyPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

THE TEACHER who ruled one-room school I attended in late 1950s had only a meager supply of pedagogical references. The books behind her desk seemed to be limited to teacher's editions of our readers and textbooks - versions that we students were prevented from examining too closely. After all, these hefty volumes contained the answers. At end of her shelf leaned a few small books designed to guide and advise isolated teacher, and I wondered what they contained. One that seemed darkly mysterious to my 8-year-old mind was called Mental Hygiene for Children. In those unenlightened times, was epithet of choice hurled thoughtlessly at anyone and everyone who behaved in even slightly peculiar ways. I knew that had to do with washing hands and cleaning fingernails, which were inspected every morning by our teacher. In name of hygiene, those of us who failed fingernail inspection were sent to cloakroom and required to brush our nails until our fingertips were scarlet. This could explain why I found concept of puzzling and somewhat frightening. I could only imagine that mental hygiene entailed a kind of vigorous brain- scrubbing, which, even though it had not yet been undertaken by stern Mrs. Baker, might be initiated in response to any behavior of which she did not approve. Such were simple fears of simpler times. It is unlikely that many of today's students fear being ambushed by teachers wielding brain-scrubbers, but according to a new report published by Canadian Institute of Child Health, of children and youths needs our urgent attention.1 The Health of Canada's Children is institute's third and most comprehensive report. Its ambitious scope is even more remarkable because data that appear in each of 11 thematically arranged chapters were assembled by experts, volunteers, activists, and young people themselves. Predictably, scrutiny of available data reveals how much information remains to be captured and raises questions about whether conventional indicators of such complex phenomena as mental health are adequate in changing times. The analytical problems multiply when changes to Canada's health-care system are factored in. For example, if fewer youths are being admitted to hospitals for psychiatric reasons, is need for acute care decreasing, or is any decline in hospital admissions merely inevitable result of reduction of available psychiatric beds? Such interpretive dilemmas aside, using results of several national longitudinal surveys and a few provincial studies, report presents more than mere snapshots. Trend lines are developing, as well as policy implications for governments and schools, and even for how parents greet their children at end of day - although such patterns may not fit technical definition of policies. Among report's more notable findings: * Children are acquiring same indifference to others of which adults are accused. Among children aged 4 to 11, parents report that only 40% of boys and 54% of girls often show sympathy; only 39% of boys and 51% of girls often offer help to other children. * Asked whether other students in their classes were often or always kind and helpful, almost 80% of Danish and Swedish 13-year- olds said that they were. Fewer Canadian students saw their peers this way: only 42% of boys and 50% of girls expressed this view, although these numbers are considerably above 34% and 39% of American boys and girls who saw habitual helpfulness in others. * Parents admit that both and aggression increases as their children age: by 11 years of age, 16% of boys are exhibiting direct aggression, such as hitting others, while 14% of girls practice indirect aggression, such as social exclusion. * Bullying behavior seems to have increased between 1994 and 1998, although it is possible that growing attention to this problem has raised awareness and influenced reporting rates. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.295
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.389
Teacher spread0.359 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it