MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2319450490 · doi:10.1177/003172170008200320

Sad, Bad, Mad: Responding to <i>the Health of Canada's Children</i>

2000· article· en· W2319450490 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Heather-Jane Robertson

Notice bibliographique

RevuePhi Delta Kappan · 2000
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineHealth Professions
ThématiqueSchool Health and Nursing Education
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPsychologyMental healthMedia studiesSociologyPsychiatry

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

THE TEACHER who ruled one-room school I attended in late 1950s had only a meager supply of pedagogical references. The books behind her desk seemed to be limited to teacher's editions of our readers and textbooks - versions that we students were prevented from examining too closely. After all, these hefty volumes contained the answers. At end of her shelf leaned a few small books designed to guide and advise isolated teacher, and I wondered what they contained. One that seemed darkly mysterious to my 8-year-old mind was called Mental Hygiene for Children. In those unenlightened times, was epithet of choice hurled thoughtlessly at anyone and everyone who behaved in even slightly peculiar ways. I knew that had to do with washing hands and cleaning fingernails, which were inspected every morning by our teacher. In name of hygiene, those of us who failed fingernail inspection were sent to cloakroom and required to brush our nails until our fingertips were scarlet. This could explain why I found concept of puzzling and somewhat frightening. I could only imagine that mental hygiene entailed a kind of vigorous brain- scrubbing, which, even though it had not yet been undertaken by stern Mrs. Baker, might be initiated in response to any behavior of which she did not approve. Such were simple fears of simpler times. It is unlikely that many of today's students fear being ambushed by teachers wielding brain-scrubbers, but according to a new report published by Canadian Institute of Child Health, of children and youths needs our urgent attention.1 The Health of Canada's Children is institute's third and most comprehensive report. Its ambitious scope is even more remarkable because data that appear in each of 11 thematically arranged chapters were assembled by experts, volunteers, activists, and young people themselves. Predictably, scrutiny of available data reveals how much information remains to be captured and raises questions about whether conventional indicators of such complex phenomena as mental health are adequate in changing times. The analytical problems multiply when changes to Canada's health-care system are factored in. For example, if fewer youths are being admitted to hospitals for psychiatric reasons, is need for acute care decreasing, or is any decline in hospital admissions merely inevitable result of reduction of available psychiatric beds? Such interpretive dilemmas aside, using results of several national longitudinal surveys and a few provincial studies, report presents more than mere snapshots. Trend lines are developing, as well as policy implications for governments and schools, and even for how parents greet their children at end of day - although such patterns may not fit technical definition of policies. Among report's more notable findings: * Children are acquiring same indifference to others of which adults are accused. Among children aged 4 to 11, parents report that only 40% of boys and 54% of girls often show sympathy; only 39% of boys and 51% of girls often offer help to other children. * Asked whether other students in their classes were often or always kind and helpful, almost 80% of Danish and Swedish 13-year- olds said that they were. Fewer Canadian students saw their peers this way: only 42% of boys and 50% of girls expressed this view, although these numbers are considerably above 34% and 39% of American boys and girls who saw habitual helpfulness in others. * Parents admit that both and aggression increases as their children age: by 11 years of age, 16% of boys are exhibiting direct aggression, such as hitting others, while 14% of girls practice indirect aggression, such as social exclusion. * Bullying behavior seems to have increased between 1994 and 1998, although it is possible that growing attention to this problem has raised awareness and influenced reporting rates. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Commentaire · Signal consensuel: Commentaire
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,053
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,388

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,006
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0330,012
Communication savante0,0060,002
Science ouverte0,0020,005
Intégrité de la recherche0,0060,013
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0160,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,030
Tête enseignante GPT0,389
Écart entre enseignants0,359 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreCommentaire

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2000
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuePhi Delta KappanMême sujetSchool Health and Nursing EducationTravaux en français237 207