Theoretical Modeling of Tunneling Barriers in Carbon-Based Molecular Electronic Junctions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Density functional theory (DFT) is applied to three models for carbon-based molecular junctions containing fragments of graphene with covalent edge-bonding to aromatic and aliphatic molecules, with the graphene representing a sp 2 hybridized carbon electrode and the molecule representing a molecular layer between two electrodes. The DFT results agree well with experimental work functions and transport barriers, including the electronic coupling between molecular layers and graphitic contacts, and predict the compression of tunnel barriers observed for both ultraviolet photoelectron spectroscopy (UPS) and experimental tunneling currents. The results reveal the strong effect of the dihedral angle between the planes of the graphene electrode and the aromatic molecule and imply that the molecules with the smallest dihedral angle are responsible for the largest local current densities. In addition, the results are consistent with the proposal that the orbitals which mediate tunneling are those with significant electron density in the molecular layer. These conclusions should prove valuable for understanding the relationships between molecular structure and electronic transport as an important step toward rational design of carbon-based molecular electronic devices.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".