Neural Networks Approach for Hyperelastic Behaviour Characterization of ABS under Uniaxial Solicitation
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recent developments in computer-aided polymer processing have brought along the need for accurate description of the behavior of materials under the conjugated effect of applied stress and temperature. In order to serve this purpose, in this study, experimental data provided by uniaxial tensile technique tests for thermoplastic halter (CTPH) comprised of hyperelastic materials when subjected to combined effects of applied stress and temperature are coupled with numerical simulations to obtain the required parameters for the characterization of such materials. First, stresses and displacements the thermoplastic halter are recorded during experiment. Thereafter, Mooney-Rivlin's and Ogden theory of hyperelastic is employed to define the constitutive model of thermoplastic halter (CTPH) and nonlinear equilibrium equations of the process are solved using finite element method with Abaqus software. As a last step, a neuronal algorithm (ANN model) is employed to minimize the difference between calculated and measured parameters to determine material constants for Mooney-Rivlin and Ogden models. Although the developed procedure can be applied to several polymeric materials, in this paper, this technique is successfully implemented for acrylonitrile-butadienestyrene (ABS). Using these coefficients, the material behavior of ABS with Mooney-Rivlin and Ogden constitutive laws is reproduced. The material model obtained in this study for ABS can be implemented into industrial and academic softwares for applications and design purposes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it