Neural Networks Approach for Hyperelastic Behaviour Characterization of ABS under Uniaxial Solicitation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recent developments in computer-aided polymer processing have brought along the need for accurate description of the behavior of materials under the conjugated effect of applied stress and temperature.In order to serve this purpose, in this study, experimental data provided by uniaxial tensile technique tests for thermoplastic halter (CTPH) comprised of hyperelastic materials when subjected to combined effects of applied stress and temperature are coupled with numerical simulations to obtain the required parameters for the characterization of such materials.First, stresses and displacements the thermoplastic halter are recorded during experiment.Thereafter, Mooney-Rivlin's and Ogden theory of hyperelastic is employed to define the constitutive model of thermoplastic halter (CTPH) and nonlinear equilibrium equations of the process are solved using finite element method with Abaqus software.As a last step, a neuronal algorithm (ANN model) is employed to minimize the difference between calculated and measured parameters to determine material constants for Mooney-Rivlin and Ogden models.Although the developed procedure can be applied to several polymeric materials, in this paper, this technique is successfully implemented for acrylonitrile-butadienestyrene (ABS).Using these coefficients, the material behavior of ABS with Mooney-Rivlin and Ogden constitutive laws is reproduced.The material model obtained in this study for ABS can be implemented into industrial and academic softwares for applications and design purposes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".