MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2319536378 · doi:10.15331/jdsm.4134

A Novel Use of Complete Denture Prosthesis as Mandibular Advancement Device in the Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Edentulous Subjects

2014· article· en· W2319536378 on OpenAlexaff
Arvind Tripathi, Ashutosh Gupta, Abhishek Dubey

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Dental Sleep Medicine · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicObstructive Sleep Apnea Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsObstructive sleep apneaMedicineDentistryProsthesisOral applianceOrthodonticsSleep apneaSurgeryAnesthesia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

W e live in an exciting time to be a dentist who provides oral appliance therapy (OAT) for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), and the American Academy of Dental Sleep Medicine (AADSM) is in the midst of a strategic stage in its growth and development as the leading professional society for dentists who treat sleep-disordered breathing.More people than ever before are in need of our expertise and care.Data from the Wisconsin Sleep Cohort suggest that the prevalence of OSA has increased substantially over the last two decades, likely due to the widespread obesity epidemic in the U.S. 1 The most current prevalence estimates are that 26 percent of adults between 30 and 70 years of age have at least mild OSA, and 10 percent of adults have moderate or severe disease.Based on this data, it has been estimated that OSA now afflicts at least 25 million adults in the U.S. 2 Addressing this growing burden of OSA, we now have more dentists than ever before who are practicing dental sleep medicine.In the span of about two-and-a-half decades, the AADSM has grown from a small group to an expansive fellowship of colleagues, with a membership of more than 3,000 individuals.More dentists in more places throughout the U.S. and abroad are offering OAT, a treatment that is life-changing for many and that has the potential to be life-saving. 3 Although we celebrate the rapid and necessary growth of dental sleep medicine, and recognize the contributions of those leaders who paved the way for us, we also must recognize the challenges that are both before us and on the horizon.Currently, the AADSM Board of Directors is in the initial stages of a strategic planning process that will address the most pressing concerns facing our organization and our membership.As we embark on this journey in the first half of my tenure as 2014-2016 president of the AADSM, I anticipate that we will spend much of our time considering and discussing competition, connection and collaboration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Dental Sleep Medicine→Same topicObstructive Sleep Apnea Research→French-language works237,207→