MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2319574458 · doi:10.1242/jeb.094680

Angry birds: a hormonal link between hunger and hostility

2014· article· en· W2319574458 on OpenAlexaffabout
Sarah L. Alderman

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Experimental Biology · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAnimal Behavior and Reproduction
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAggressionTestosterone (patch)HormoneInternal medicineEndocrinologyBiologyPsychologyMedicineDevelopmental psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ever fought over the last piece of pie? Aggressive competition is common among animals, and hormones play a major role in such behavior. One of these hormones is testosterone, which is produced by the testes and directly interacts with brain regions involved in social interactions. The brain can also convert testosterone into estradiol, another hormone that is a key regulator of male aggression. Hungry animals can be especially aggressive over food, but it is not known which hormones regulate food-related aggression. Testosterone from the testes is not likely to be involved because fasting is stressful and stress suppresses testosterone production by the testes. A testosterone precursor – called dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) – could regulate food-related aggression because fasting increases its levels and the brain can convert DHEA to testosterone and estradiol. In Kiran Soma's lab at the University of British Columbia, Canada, postdoctoral researcher H. Bobby Fokidis is using social songbirds to investigate whether DHEA is the molecular link between fighting and food.Fokidis and his colleagues decided to stage a bird food fight in the lab. First, the team housed adult male zebra finches in groups of two to four birds for 6 h with full access to food (fed), an empty food dish (fasted) or 6 h with an empty food dish followed by 15 min with full access to food (re-fed). Then, they removed all of the food dishes and all of the birds were offered food from a point-source feeder that only allowed one bird at a time to perch and access food. The team then filmed the birds to see how much jostling went on at the feeder, and measured the birds' levels of testosterone, DHEA and estradiol to find out which of these hormones was controlling the food fight.The team found that the energetic zebra finch does not like to go without food. Compared with the fed group, the fasted group was more aggressive when the point-source feeder was introduced, and frequently chased and displaced other birds in their group. Aggression in the re-fed group was intermediate between that of the fed and fasted groups, showing that food status was directly involved in these behaviors.Next, the team looked at how hormone levels compared between the three treatment groups. They found that testosterone was lower in blood taken from the brachial veins of birds that were fasted for 6 h, even if they were then re-fed. Blood in the brachial vein has not been to the brain yet, so any hormones found here were made in peripheral organs. Therefore, the team ruled out testosterone made in the testes as the hormone responsible for turning the feathered friends into foes. When the team measured DHEA levels in the brachial vein, they found that it was higher in the fasted group than in either the fed or re-fed groups, and when the team checked the two organs that produce it – the liver and adrenal glands – they found higher DHEA there too. However, the team found no differences in DHEA levels in blood taken from the jugular veins of birds in any of the treatment groups. Because blood in the jugular vein has just left the brain, the team thought that the extra DHEA made by the liver and adrenal glands of the fasted birds must have been converted to another hormone by the brain. In fact, Fokidis and his colleagues found more estradiol, which can be made from DHEA, in several brain regions that mediate social aggression in both the fasted and re-fed birds compared with the fed birds.So, this study shows that DHEA may mediate food-related aggression after it is converted to estradiol in neural circuits that regulate social interactions, and drives who gets the last crumb in a zebra finch food fight.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Experimental Biology→Same topicAnimal Behavior and Reproduction→French-language works237,207→