MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2319575530 · doi:10.11641/pde.84.1_86

A patient with Cronkhite-Canada syndrome whose entire digestive tracts was examined endoscopically

2014· article· en· W2319575530 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
T. Fukuda, Satoshi Imamura, Keiko Ono, Yuya Tsunoda, Tsuyoshi Ito, Toshihide Tamura, Shuichi Nagakubo, Yuichi Morohoshi, Yuji Koike, Yuriko Fujita, Hirokazu Komatsu

Bibliographic record

VenueProgress of Digestive Endoscopy · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGenetic factors in colorectal cancer
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePrednisoloneDuodenumVomitingStomachNauseaGastroenterologyEpigastric painInternal medicineBiopsyFailure to thrive

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 60-year-old woman was referred to our hospital with nausea, vomiting, taste disorder, alopecia, onichodystrophy and epigastric pain. Laboratory examination showed under-nutritionand abdominal computed tomography showed a thickened stomach wall. Endoscopic examination of the entire digestive tract showed multiple salmon roe-like polyp in the stomach, duodenum, ileum, and colon. Pathologically, biopsy specimens from the polyp-like lesions and mucosa revealed edematous change of the intestitium and cystic dilatation of the glands. We diagnosed the patient as having Cronkhite-Canada syndrome because of the polyposis associated with abnormalities of the ectoderm. Prednisolone therapy was initiated at 40 mg per day, with tapering of the dose subsequently. The clinical symptoms, laboratory data and polyposis improved with the prednisolone therapy. The prognosis of patients with Cronkhite-Canada syndrome treated with prednisolone is favorable, however, it has been reported recently that Cronkhite-Canada syndrome is associated with a risk of carcinogenesis. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct periodic screening of the entire digestive tract even after mucosal improvement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.098
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProgress of Digestive EndoscopySame topicGenetic factors in colorectal cancerFrench-language works237,207