Self-sensing of Strain in Carbon Nanotube Modified Carbon Fibre Reinforced Composites
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The aim of this work was to systematically investigate the influence of CNT addition on strain self-sensing of CF based composites. By comparing the electromechanical behaviour of CF-epoxy and CF-CNT-epoxy composites, it was found that the addition of CNTs improves the sensitivity and the reproducibility of the electric responses to mechanical loading. These improvements are mainly attributed to the lower and more even value of CFCF contact resistance and the more homogeneous distribution of CF-CF contact position. In addition, an analytical model was used to simulate the change in surface resistance on tensile and compressive sides of the CF-epoxy specimen with three-point bending loading. With sensitivity analysis, it was found that the surface resistance was mostly sensitive to the longitudinal resistance. However, the change in through-thickness resistance played a dominated role in affecting the surface resistance with mechanical loading, particularly on the compressive side.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it