MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2319641898 · doi:10.1115/imece2010-38961

Comparison Between Numerical Simulation and Experimentation of Asymmetrical Three-Roll Bending Process

2010· article· en· W2319641898 on OpenAlexaff
Zhengkun Feng, Henri Champliaud

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMetal Forming Simulation Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBendingFinite element methodDisplacement (psychology)Node (physics)Structural engineeringNonlinear systemShell (structure)Computer simulationProcess (computing)Mechanical engineeringMaterials scienceEngineeringComputer scienceSimulationPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Three-roll bending processes are widely used in metal forming manufacturing due to simple configurations. Asymmetrical three-roll bending is one of the processes. This paper deals with the simulation analyses based on the finite element method for cylindrical production. The components of the roll bending machine, such as the rolls were assumed to be rigid bodies and the 4-node shell elements were used in the modeling. The tensile test of the material was simulated to determine the elasto-plastic material model of the plate. Automatic node-surface contacts were chosen for the interfaces between the plate and the rigid bodies. The nonlinear equations which represent the structural dynamics with large displacement were resolved using explicit time integration. The simulations were performed under the well-known ANSYS/LS-DYNA environment. The numerical results agree well with the experimental ones.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.725
Threshold uncertainty score0.354

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.382
Teacher spread0.342 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMetal Forming Simulation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207