Experimental Study on Micro-Droplets of Molten Wax Impacting on Solid Surfaces
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
*† ‡ In the indirect ink-jetting printer, the deposition of ink droplets on solid surfaces is a crucial step in the printing process. This paper studies the interaction between ink droplets and solid surfaces by experimentally simulating different printing conditions. When a superheated ink droplet of 39 µm in diameter impacts on a sub-cooled solid surface, it spreads and solidifies, forming a dot on the solid surface. The equilibrium shape of the dot is determined by its flow history and thermal history during impact. Three parameters are varied to change the experimental condition, namely the substrate temperature, the type of substrate surface and the distance between the substrate surface and the printhead. The dimensional characteristics of the dot are characterized measuring the basal diameter, height and the apparent contact angle. The experimental results are presented, and the explanations are provided.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it