MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2319716185 · doi:10.1097/ijg.0000000000000111

Peptide-based Treatment Strategies for Cataract

2014· review· en· W2319716185 on OpenAlexaff
Sibel Çetinel, Larry D. Unsworth, Carlo Montemagno

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Glaucoma · 2014
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicConnexins and lens biology
Canadian institutionsNational Institute for Nanotechnology
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBlindnessCataract surgeryLens (geology)OphthalmologyGlaucomaOptometryOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cataract produces vision loss due to opacification of the lens. Two possible reasons for cataract formation are insolubility of crystallin proteins and fibril (aggregate) formation. Currently, the only available treatment is surgical replacement of the lens with a synthetic one. An alternative treatment that is both economically and technologically accessible is needed in developing countries where untreated cataract and coincident blindness is high, access to trained surgeons is limited, and the cost of surgery may be prohibitive. We present current progress toward the development of a nonsurgical treatment strategy focusing on promoting protein solubility and/or dissolving fibrillar aggregates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.992
Threshold uncertainty score0.830

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of GlaucomaSame topicConnexins and lens biologyFrench-language works237,207