MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2319754312 · doi:10.1103/physreva.89.014102

Identification of the Keldysh time as a lower limit for the tunneling time

2014· article· en· W2319754312 on OpenAlexaff
Gianfranco Orlando, Chris McDonald, N. H. Protik, Thomas Brabec

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review A · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum optics and atomic interactions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsQuasistatic processLimit (mathematics)Quantum tunnellingEigenvalues and eigenvectorsField (mathematics)Quantum mechanicsTime limitFunction (biology)Quantum electrodynamicsStatistical physicsMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

By using first-principles arguments, based on the time-energy uncertainty principle in the form given by Mandelstam and Tamm, we show that the Keldysh time represents a lower limit for the tunnel time. We use the definition of the tunnel time as identified in a recent numerical investigation [C. R. McDonald et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 090405 (2013)]; it is the time it takes for the unperturbed initial ground-state wave function to evolve into the field-perturbed final eigenstate which is the quasistatic field dressed resonance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0020.005
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review ASame topicQuantum optics and atomic interactionsFrench-language works237,207