MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2319757813 · doi:10.1109/biocas.2014.6981812

56-channel direct-coupled chopper-stabilized EEG monitoring ASIC with digitally-assisted offset correction at the folding nodes

2014· article· en· W2319757813 on OpenAlexaff
Arezu Bagheri, Mohammad T. Salam, José Luis Pérez Velázquez, Roman Genov

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAnalog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChopperComputer scienceChannel (broadcasting)AmplifierOffset (computer science)Electronic engineeringTopology (electrical circuits)Electrical engineeringBandwidth (computing)EngineeringTelecommunicationsVoltage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a 56-channel neural recording interface with a chopper-stabilized DC-coupled front-end and a programmable mixed-signal DC cancelation feedback. Each recording channel has a fully-differential amplifier with 51-54dB of gain, an input-referred noise of 5μV <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">rms</sub> integrated from 10Hz to 5kHz and a CMRR of 65dB. Input DC-coupling allows for a simple chopping scheme without the area overhead of large capacitors and extra non-idealities compensation circuitry. Chopping is used to reduce the integrated input-referred noise from 7.5μV <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">rms</sub> to 4.2μV <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">rms</sub> over the bandwidth of 1Hz to 1KHz. Each channel contains a digital integrator and a 16-bit delta-sigma DAC in the feedback in order to cancel input DC offsets of up to α50mV and suppress the low frequency drift. Compensating the input DC offset at the folding node of the OTA provides an input-referred noise that is independent of the DC offset value. The recorded data by the array is digitized by 8 column-parallel SAR ADCs with 8-bit resolution and ENOB of 6.6 bits. Each channel in the neural recording array occupies 0.018mm <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup> . The 8.7mm <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup> die, fabricated in a 0.13μm CMOS process, dissipates 1.07mW from a 1.2V supply. The integrated circuit has been validated in vivo in online intracranial EEG recording in freely moving rats.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.489
Threshold uncertainty score0.806

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAnalog and Mixed-Signal Circuit DesignFrench-language works237,207