Conformational Study of the Hydroxyproline–O–Glycosidic Linkage: Sugar–Peptide Orientation and Prolyl Amide Isomerization in (α/β)–Galactosylated 4(<i>R</i>/<i>S</i>)–Hydroxyproline
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Glycosylation is a frequent post-translational modification of proteins that has been shown to influence protein structure and function. Glycosylation of hydroxyproline occurs widely in plants, but is absent in humans and animals. Previous experimental studies on model amides have indicated that α/β-galactosylation of 4R-hydroxyproline (Hyp) has no measurable effect on prolyl amide isomerization, while a 7% increase in the trans isomer population, as well as a 25-50% increase in the isomerization rate, was observed for the 4S stereoisomer (hyp). In this work, molecular dynamics simulations in explicit water and implicit solvent DFT optimizations are used to examine the structure of the hydroxyproline-O-galactosyl linkage and the effect of glycosylation on the structure and cis/trans isomerization of the peptide backbone. The calculations show two major minima with respect to the glycosidic linkage in all compounds. The C(γ)-exo puckering observed in 4R compounds projects the sugar away from the peptide backbone, while a twisted C(γ)-endo/C(β)-exo pucker in the 4S compounds brings the peptide and sugar rings together and leads to an intramolecular hydrogen-bonding interaction that is sometimes bridged by a water molecule. This hydrogen bond changes the conformation of the peptide backbone, inducing a favorable n → π* interaction between the oxygen lone pair from the prolyl N-terminal amide and the C═O, which explains the observed increase in trans isomer population in α/β-galactosylated 4S-hydroxyproline. Our results provide the first molecular level information about this important glycosidic linkage, as well as provide an explanation for the previously observed increase in trans isomer population in 4S-hyp compounds. Moreover, this study provides evidence that sugar-mediated long-range hydrogen bonding between hydroxyl groups and the carbonyl peptide backbone can modify the properties of N-terminal prolyl cis/trans isomerization in peptides.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".