MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2319814295 · doi:10.1061/40927(243)480

Low and Negative Pressures in Distribution Systems: Do They Actually Result in Intrusion?

2007· article· en· W2319814295 on OpenAlexafffund
Marie‐Claude Besner, Gabrielle Ebacher, Jean Lavoie, Michèle Prévost

Bibliographic record

VenueWorld Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2007 · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWater Treatment and Disinfection
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique MontréalNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Water Network
KeywordsIntrusionContaminationEnvironmental scienceResidualWater qualityChlorineChemistryGeologyEcologyBiologyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The magnitude of low and negative pressures induced by the closure and repair of a transmission main in a distribution system (DS) was investigated along with the potential for intrusion and changes in water quality associated with these low/negative pressures. Field equipment included high-speed pressure transient data loggers, on-line turbidimeters and grab samples that were analyzed for total coliform bacteria, E. coli, aerobic spore forming bacteria, residual chlorine, temperature and conductivity. Results of the monitoring showed that the closure of the transmission main was the cause of significant and sustained negative pressures in the DS under study. However, the water quality monitoring did not reveal significant water contamination. The specific conditions of the system under study and the inability to detect contamination in chlorinated systems with the current analytical methods could explain such results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWorld Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2007Same topicWater Treatment and DisinfectionFrench-language works237,207