MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2319868568 · doi:10.1177/1367877904044252

Punk and Globalization

2004· article· en· W2319868568 on OpenAlex
Alan O’Connor

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Cultural Studies · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMusic History and Culture
Canadian institutionsTrent University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPunkGlobalizationHabitusSociologySubculture (biology)EthnographyTourismMusicalThe InternetMedia studiesInequalityPublic spaceGender studiesSocial scienceAestheticsPolitical scienceAnthropologyVisual artsHistoryLawArt historyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Against theories of cultural globalization, this article argues that there are substantial inequities in the global flows of punk subculture between different parts of the world. The flows are unequal and unbalanced. The use of the internet contributes to this inequality rather than solving it. Drawing on ethnographic descriptions of the scenes in Mexico City and Barcelona, the article shows that there are considerable differences in access to public space, radio stations, styles of dress and musical performances between the two cities. The article argues that Bourdieu’s concept of habitus is still relevant even in an epoch of rapid global communication.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.892
Threshold uncertainty score0.234

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it