MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2319883624 · doi:10.17952/24aps.2015.272

4,5-Disubstituted N-aminoimdazol-2-One Mimics of Peptide Turn Backbone and Side Chain Conformation

2015· article· en· W2319883624 on OpenAlexafffund
Julien Poupart, Duc Doan-Ngoc, William D. Lubell

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicChemical Synthesis and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsDipeptideSide chainChemistryPeptideEpimerStereochemistryResidue (chemistry)Amino acidRacemizationOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nai residues have been shown by NMR spectroscopy and X-ray crystallography to adopt turn conformations, and have been incorporated into biologically active peptides to study structure-activity relationships (Figure 1) [1,2]. The synthesis of Nai residues has entailed alkylation of aza-glycinyl dipeptides with propargyl bromide using tetraethyl ammonium hydroxide, followed by sodium hydride induced 5-exo-dig cyclisation and exoto endo-alkene epimerization. By performing a Sonogashira reaction on the aza-propargylglycine residue prior to ring formation, various aromatic and heteroaromatic ring systems have been introduced at the 4-position of the aminoimdazol-2-one residue. Although the use of strong base led to epimerization of aza-glycinyl dipeptide C-terminal α-amino esters, the Nai dipeptide enantiomers were effectively separated by chiral supercritical fluid chromatography [3]. After liberation of the carboxylic acid, the resulting Nai dipeptide building blocks have been inserted into longer peptide structures by standard coupling methods [1,2]. The current method for Nai peptide construction offers effective means for introducing substituents at the 4-position to mimic different amino acid side chains. Moreover, the 4-position substituents have been observed by crystallographic analyses to influence the conformation of the C-terminal α-amino acid residue side chain in model Nai peptides [2]. Considering the natural orientation of amino acid side chains in chi-space [4], the Nai 5-position represents a promising location for the attachment of substituents for peptide mimicry [5]. Evidence that the backbone and side chain geometry of natural amino acids involved in β-turns may be mimicked by 5-aryl Nai residues was derived from molecular modelling using HyperChem 8, which predicted that model Nai peptide 1 adopted a type II β-turn conformation in which the aromatic side chain χ torsion angle was oriented in a gauche (–) conformation (Figure 1). Aromatic residues are abundant at the central positions of turn conformations of naturally occurring bioactive peptides, such as somatostatin [6]. Constrained mimics of aryl amino acids that adopt turn conformations may thus offer interesting potential for studying structure-activity relationships [7]. Arylation of the Nai 5-position is thus being studied to provide rigidified aryl and heteroarylalanine residues for turn mimicry.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicChemical Synthesis and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207