MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2319909015 · doi:10.1149/1.3481238

(Invited) Nanocrystalline Silicon Thin Film Transistors

2010· article· en· W2319909015 on OpenAlexafffund
Mohammad Reza Esmaeili Rad, G. Reza Chaji, C.-H. Lee, Denis Striakhilev, Andrei Sazonov, Arokia Nathan

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Transactions · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicThin-Film Transistor Technologies
Canadian institutionsIGNIS Innovation (Canada)
FundersEngineering and Physical Sciences Research CouncilNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaRoyal Society
KeywordsThin-film transistorMaterials scienceOxide thin-film transistorOptoelectronicsGate dielectricNanocrystalline siliconAmorphous siliconGate oxideCrystallinitySiliconAmorphous solidDielectricNanocrystalline materialSilicon nitrideTransistorActive layerHigh-κ dielectricLayer (electronics)NanotechnologyElectrical engineeringCrystalline siliconCrystallographyComposite materialChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We review performance characteristics of top- and bottom-gate nanocrystalline silicon (nc-Si) thin film transistors (TFTs). Top gate TFTs with nc-Si active layer of nearly 80% crystallinity along with a silicon oxide gate dielectric produce high electron mobilities; values two orders higher than the amorphous silicon counterpart. In contrast, bottom-gate TFTs with silicon nitride gate dielectric and nc-Si active layer of similar crystallinity yield a mobility that is only marginally better than amorphous silicon TFT. However, they are highly stable with no visible presence of defect state creation in the active layer. In contrast, top-gate TFTs suffer from severe charge trapping in the low quality oxide gate dielectric.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.490
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.188
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS TransactionsSame topicThin-Film Transistor TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207