Bibliographic record
Abstract
The music of soundThere is something in the air in the world of sound art, and that might even be an understatement.After the Japanese No-No Duo (June 2000) and Canadian Jean-Franois Laporte (November), Brandon LaBelle showed how to create a maximal performance with a puzzled out minimum on ingredients.A report of an amazing concert and a walk with an intriguing personality.The Californian arrives at the Logos Foundation in the afternoon, packed with only two bags, that's it.Maybe not enough time to draw the best conclusions from the tetrahedron site, a week would be ideal.Nevertheless, he subjects the architecture -the found space -to a profound gaze, searching for idiosyncrasies.Wanting to transform the concert hall into a site of sound, he attaches 3 Volts-motors to two tetrahedron edges.Four glasses from the Logos bar and two paper bags will be used as sound transplanting media; a plastic bag, four portable cassette players, metal bars and his own mouth form his sound arsenal.Nothing more, nothing less, except from some contact microphones, a wire with an open end and amplification equipment.Not one object is hidden from the eye of the spectators, everything is displayed on the grey floor, thus promoting anticipation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.010 | 0.027 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".