MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2319913290 · doi:10.2514/6.2015-1255

Semi-Active Control of Torsional Vibrations Using a New Hybrid Torsional Damper

2015· article· en· W2319913290 on OpenAlexaff
Ehab Abouobaia, Rama Bhat, Ramin Sedaghati

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVibration Control and Rheological Fluids
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTorsional vibrationDamperVibration controlVibrationStructural engineeringTuned mass damperControl theory (sociology)Materials sciencePhysicsComputer scienceEngineeringControl (management)Acoustics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Torsional vibration is an important issue in many industrial applications with rotating mechanical components. Excessive torsional vibrations may result in noise, excessive stresses or even fatigue failure if not controlled expeditiously. The present research aims at developing a novel hybrid semi-active torsional vibration damper incorporating a conventional Centrifugal Pendulum Vibration Absorber (CPVA) and a Magnetorheological (MR) damper capable of suppressing torsional vibration under varying excitation frequencies. Two different strategies were carried out for controlling damping torque of the MR damper. First, the passive control approach of the MR damper is implemented in two cases, 1) When the applied current is set to zero, 2) When it is set to a constant value. The system response is investigated at resonance condition, when the excitation frequency coincides with the natural frequency of the system and torsional vibration response of the system is illustrated in each case. In the second approach, the semi-active Skyhook control algorithm with variable applied current is implemented for improving the performance of the hybrid damper. Torsional response of the system is illustrated in each case and compared with one another.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.876
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicVibration Control and Rheological FluidsFrench-language works237,207