Comparison of the Electronic Conduction Mechanism in MnO <sub>x</sub> -CaO-SiO <sub>2</sub> and FeO <sub>x</sub> -CaO-SiO <sub>2</sub> Slag Systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The electrical and electronic and ionic transference numbers were measured for slags in the system MnO-CaO-SiO 2 using the stepped potential chronoamperometry method. Transference numbers were measured over a range of oxygen partial pressure to evaluate the effect of MnO-CaO-SiO 2 . The data were compared with previously measured data for the FeO-CaO-SiO 2 system. Data were found to fit well, the Diffusion Assisted Hopping Model for electronic conduction previously develop in the authors' laboratory. The only adjustable parameter employed in fitting the data to this model, was, r * , the maximum spacing at which hopping can occur. A single value for this parameter was used for all manganese data. The value of r * obtained for the MnO-CaO-SiO 2 system was slightly smaller than that for the FeO-CaO-SiO 2 system which is in keeping with the relative magnitude of the third ionization energies for Fe and Mn.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".