MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2320069667 · doi:10.7202/1027547ar

La guerre des codes criminels annotés. Guy COURNOYER, Gilles OUIMET, Code criminel annoté 2003, Montréal, Les Éditions Yvon Blais, 2002, 2316 pages, ISBN 2-89451-588-X Alain DUBOIS, Philip SCHNEIDER, Code criminel et lois connexes annotés 2003, Brossard, Publications CCH ltée, 2002, 2211 pages, ISBN 2-89366-402-4

2003· article· fr· W2320069667 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Jamie Furniss, Keith Hanna

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue générale de droit · 2003
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEuropean Criminal Justice and Data Protection
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La guerre des codes criminels annotés / Guy COURNOYER, Gilles OUIMET, Code criminel annoté 2003, Montréal, Les Éditions Yvon Blais, 2002, 2316 pages, ISBN 2-89451-588-X / Alain DUBOIS, Philip SCHNEIDER, Code criminel et lois connexes annotés 2003, Brossard, Publications CCH ltée, 2002, 2211 pages, ISBN 2-89366-402-4. Un article de la revue Revue générale de droit (Volume 33, numéro 1, 2003, p. 1-172) diffusée par la plateforme Érudit.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.115
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.005
Science and technology studies0.0050.005
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue générale de droitSame topicEuropean Criminal Justice and Data ProtectionFrench-language works237,207