MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2320073064 · doi:10.1103/physreve.91.012137

Asymptotic analysis of narrow escape problems in nonspherical three-dimensional domains

2015· article· en· W2320073064 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review E · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDiffusion and Search Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversities Space Research Association
KeywordsFirst-hitting-time modelAsymptotic expansionDomain (mathematical analysis)Bounded functionBrownian motionMathematicsMathematical analysisAsymptotic analysisSolverStatistical physicsPhysicsMathematical optimizationStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Narrow escape problems consider the calculation of the mean first passage time (MFPT) for a particle undergoing Brownian motion in a domain with a boundary that is everywhere reflecting except for at finitely many small holes. Asymptotic methods for solving these problems involve finding approximations for the MFPT and average MFPT that increase in accuracy with decreasing hole sizes. While relatively much is known for the two-dimensional case, the results available for general three-dimensional domains are rather limited. This paper addresses the problem of finding the average MFPT for a class of three-dimensional domains bounded by the level surface of an orthogonal coordinate system. In particular, this class includes spheroids and other solids of revolution. The primary result presented is a two-term asymptotic expansion for the average MFPT of such domains containing an arbitrary number of holes. Steps are taken towards finding higher-order asymptotic expansions for both the average MFPT and the MFPT in these domains. The results for the average MFPT are compared to full numerical calculations performed with the comsol Multiphysics finite element solver for three distinct domains: prolate and oblate spheroids and biconcave disks. This comparison shows good agreement with the proposed two-term expansion of the average MFPT in the three domains.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.674
Threshold uncertainty score0.347

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it