MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2320096930 · doi:10.1021/ef101013m

Heavy Oil Viscosity Modeling with Friction Theory

2011· article· en· W2320096930 on OpenAlexafffund
Ashutosh Kumar, Amr Henni, Ezeddin Shirif

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy & Fuels · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhase Equilibria and Thermodynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
FundersPetroleum Technology Research CentreConocoPhillips
KeywordsViscositySaturation (graph theory)Oil viscosityThermodynamicsPhase (matter)Materials scienceMechanicsMathematicsChemistryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new tuning method is proposed for the cubic equation-of-state-based friction theory viscosity model, which improves the viscosity prediction of heavy oils. With the existing tuning method, the error in viscosity prediction increases with increasing viscosity. Particularly, at pressures below the saturation pressure, the error keeps increasing as the pressure is farther away from the saturation pressure. With the proposed tuning method, whereas the single-phase error is almost the same, the two-phase error is approximately 1 / 3 the value of the error from the existing tuning method. Most importantly, the proposed tuning method successfully uses experimental viscosity data below the saturation pressure to reduce prediction errors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.563
Threshold uncertainty score0.451

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.183
Teacher spread0.170 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnergy & FuelsSame topicPhase Equilibria and ThermodynamicsFrench-language works237,207